Saturday, August 04, 2007

More newspaper humour

Without comment, here’s the opening paragraph of a Delhi Times story about how infidelity “is no longer a taboo” (it’s from a column called, appropriately enough, Mind Twister – okay okay, I know I said “without comment”):
Oh, just look around you. Infidelity seems to be the single greatest fascination of our age. Everyone’s at it! That 45-year-old woman, who sits in the cubicle outside. She’s got a string of boyfriends, inside and outside office. And a husband, who is busy philandering himself. There’s a sadist pleasure, with couples teasing each other: “Catch me, if you can!” Indeed!
And that’s just the first para. Can you imagine how entertaining 1,000 words of this can be? It’s like I always say, when the mind is weighed down by water tanks and tax returns, Delhi Times makes life seem bright and purposeful again.

More seriously, this reminds me that for a long time now I’ve meant to start a regular series on the very particular type of bad writing/editing found in our daily newspapers (not just Delhi Times, which is a soft target, but even the supposedly respectable ones) – the punning, the clichés, the dreadful comma misplacements, the ending of sentences with words like “Indeed!!” and “What say you??!” in an idiotic attempt at being “trendy and cool” (no really, that’s the justification a desk head gave me once!), and of course the countless examples of awkward sentence construction.

The reasons I haven’t done this yet: a) it’s too daunting a task, as tough as writing an encyclopedia single-handed, b) it would involve closely reading newspapers, which I can’t bring myself to do (“Dilbert”, “The Wizard of Id”, “Beau Peep” and one Delhi Times story are usually enough for a day) and c) The idea isn’t to get pedantic, just to have some fun. I don’t believe the quality of writing in our papers can ever improve – and especially not now, given the amount of movement in Indian journalism, youngsters flitting from one job to the next without being meaningfully trained at any one place, and the fact that bad grammar is firmly rooted in most copy-desk departments anyway, with senior deskies/editors just as culpable as anyone else. So this wouldn’t be an “improve the world” project. (That would be pointless anyway, since the species won’t last beyond the next 30 years. Hopefully.) And if it’s just a having-fun-once-in-a-while sort of thing, why make it a regular series at all? Much better to transcribe the occasional gems like the infidelity story opening paragraph. What say you??!

15 comments:

  1. The problem doesn't just end with newspapers. You see the same thing happening with news channels ( especially Hindi channels)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well take the idea seriously. I have lots of contributions, and if you don't appreciate them, I'll post 'em myself.

    I am having the equipments to do the needful.

    What say YOU?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Please do it. When I think of the relief it would bring... rather than all of us suffering individually and silently. I sometimes wonder at the power of a misplaced comma or an inane phrase and the easy with which they can irritate me so much. But forming a tribe to nake fun of nasty rogue sentences will be so soothing; I feel better already, knowing I can belong to a fraternity -- it's prompted me to post a comment for the first time.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Why not let's talk about hyphens (“countless examples of awkward sentence-construction”)?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Phoenix, Deepdown: I doubt I'll be able to do it in an elaborate way - will maybe just put up a few points here and there (have made a few notes already).

    PPP: thanks, have removed the offending hyphen (good thing this blog isn't "the world's most widely read newspaper" with 3-4 stages of copy-editing, huh?).

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yaaaah! Do it! Burn it all to the ground!

    Sorry. I'm just excited. But this is a good idea. Go ahead with it, and not just for funsies.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes, do it. So that we can have some vicarious pleasure too; just like you mentioned in your last post. :-D

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think you should do it. What irritates me most these days is the way interviews end with "he/she signs off" or "he she quips" when the person os very clearly not quipping.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Please don't. They're painful enough without the reprise.

    J.A.P.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I am going off tangent to your post (as usual!!?!)

    In the final part of the Lord of the Rings, in the scene where Aragon meets the army of the half-dead he repeats the dialogue "What say you" three times.

    That scene is my best scene *ever* :D

    ReplyDelete
  11. Neha: fie on you for linking Tolkien with TOIlet paper!

    ReplyDelete
  12. I myself, like deepdown said, feel a little better that someone else is also taking note. I'm not a 'literary type' but even my kind find it excruciatingly painful to read what should be simple English in Indian media these days.

    Yes, please do it. Make their...uppance come!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. And it's not even "What say you??!!", it's "Wot". Shudder. Seriously, please do it.

    ReplyDelete